How Sexual Favors Are Used As Bribes  

From a legal point of view, sexual bribery is a harassment in the form of providing something in exchange of a sexual act or relationship. A sexual bribe can be asked by either employers or superiors in the workplace, by public servants or officials, or by offenders of the law. Ultimately, like any form of bribe, these people aim to come out in a more favorable position than the one they are currently at. However, instead of using money, sexual favors are use due to either preference or lack of any other means to improve their welfare.

In the Workplace

Sexual favors are usually asked in the workplace by managers or owners of an employee’s company. Common forms of (subtle or explicit) solicitation for such favors are usually made either for exchange of a raise or a promotion, or under threat of punishment or termination of employment. Aside from these, sexual favors are also known to be coerced under the threat of negative performance reports, and unlawful passing over or withholding of promotion or raise. Given how this could dramatically affect the financial or economic well-being of a person, acting out these sexual favors are seen as more favorable than foregoing better income or position, or undergoing a bad record or termination of their jobs.

In the Government

Another way of bribing with sex is providing it through a third party. Criminals and businessmen in China are providing public officials with the services of prostitutes instead of cash or gifts in exchange for favors. This is done as officials who accept bribes that are in the form of gifts or money can be punished with harsh penalties and even with death. But, sexual favors are not covered by the law and this loophole is the one being abused by those who seek favors from government officials.

There was even a case of a provincial official who accepted sexual favors from a young woman. In exchange, he appointed the woman as the new head of the representative office in Hong Kong for China’s provincial government.

In Law Enforcement

In this situation, the offer or request for a social favor could come from either the person in authority or the one under threat of punishment. The person in authority could request for a sexual favor in exchange for letting the other party forego punishment or certified for a certain government requirement. This is how a federal immigration officer from New York found himself sentenced for a year and a half to four years of jail time. He was found guilty of soliciting sex in exchange for a green card from a 22-year-old woman from Colombia.

In School

In cases of sexual bribery in the educational system, offenders often solicit sexual favors in exchange of better grades from those who are either in danger of failing a subject or not making the cut for an award. One example of such offense is Michael Ngilangwa, a teacher from a secondary school in Tanzania. He was sentenced in June 2011 to either pay a fine or a term of imprisonment as punishment for soliciting sexual favors from a student in exchange for better exam results.

On the Internet

Internet cases of sex bribery are often done via blackmail. A fake social media account of the offender would lure individuals to revealing compromising and private information. Then, the suspect would threaten these individuals into revealing or publishing their conversation if they do not send him or her nude photos or videos. This was how Christopher Patrick Gunn of Montgomery, Alabama was able to extort nude videos and pictures from underage girls. Many milf sex apps have been unfortunately used in this manner. Members will ask for milf pics of their pussy and then get caught in a sexting blackmail scheme.

Sexual favors are just another form of currency to get people what they want in a situation. It could be either to gain or avoid something. Either way, asking for or bribing someone with sexual favors corrupts the system. Because of this, this is punishable in the same way bribing someone with gifts or money.

To avoid getting yourself in a situation wherein you could be blackmailed into giving sexual favors, it is best to take preventive measures like protecting your personal information and avoiding the taking of photos and videos that could besmirch your reputation. Furthermore, it is best to record in any possible manner conversations that ask or coerce you of such bribes. In this way, you can provide evidence to authorities for any charges filed.

A HISTORY OF BRIBERY IN THE UNITED STATES

Bribery is the act of giving compensation in various forms (it may be through money, goods, or services) for a change in the behavior of a particular recipient, ultimately resulting to the fulfillment of some request which is to the interest and/or benefit of the giver.

 

In the United States, bribery has been evident most especially in the corporate arena. The act of bribery often occurs when companies make payments in order to expedite a process, obtain a contract, or retain business. These payments are usually made to foreign government officials or any person who is in a position of power to alter something within a process. Practices of bribery in the U.S. have been recorded dating back to the 1800’s.

 

Even though there were already allegations on officials involved in bribery even during the 1800’s, these cases were not officially investigated and no reports have actually been made. It has only been in the late 1990’s and early 2000’s that bribery cases involving large sums of money and massive companies and conglomerates were submitted to thorough and formal probes and queries.

 

The primary catalyst for the formulation of legislative laws against bribery in the United States was the 1973 Watergate political scandal which ultimately led to the Former U.S. President Richard Nixon’s resignation. Through investigations made by the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), the scandal revealed quite a number of U.S. companies who have admitted that they have made suspicious or illegal payments to different foreign government officials and politicians. Due to this, the U.S. government has enacted the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) in 1977 which accordingly bans these companies from making payments and or offering any form of compensation in order to influence foreign officials.

 

Although the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act has been in implementation since 1977 and has been amended a few times, this hasn’t stopped some companies from committing acts of bribery all the way to the 2016 snapsex case. In fact, below are three of some bribery cases committed by companies in the history of the United States.

 

  • KBR and Halliburton Case

In 2008, a formal investigation by the U.S. SEC alongside the U.S. DOJ found significant evidences of FCPA violations made by Texas-based engineering and construction company Kellogg Brown and Root (KBR), along with parent company Halliburton.

 

It was evident in the case that KBR and Halliburton made payments closely amounting to the sum of $200 million to the various-ranking officials in the Nigerian Government in order to obtain engineering, procurement and construction contracts.

 

By 2009, the companies pleaded guilty and were fined a sum of nearly $600 million in order to settle the FCPA charges. Additionally, former president Albert ‘Jack’ Stanley was sentenced to seven years in jail.

 

  • Siemens AG

Siemens AG is a large German conglomerate, and possibly Europe’s biggest engineering company, embroiled in what was arguably the largest bribery case recorded in history. The company’s bribery payments made across four continents, in order to secure government contracts, totaled to a massive $1.4 billion. These payments were made to foreign officials from the years spanning 2001 to 2007.

 

When the company pleaded guilty in 2008, its fines amounted to $1.6 billion paid to Germany and the U.S. This not yet including the $1 billion paid to the prosecutors and accountants in charge of the investigation.

 

What is actually a relief to note though is that following the results of the prosecution, the Siemens conglomerate had undergone a sort of transformation and cleansing process in the leadership of Chief Executive Officer Peter Löscher with the aid of Peter Solmssen. Ironically, the massively-fined scandal has paved the way for Siemens to be recognized as one of the most transparent firms globally, implementing a corporate compliance program that is debatably top in its ranks.

 

  • BAE Systems

BAE Systems is a defence company considered to be one of the largest in the world with services comprising technology-led defence, aerospace and security solutions. In 2007, the company was submitted to several investigations regarding formal accusations involving bribery. Allegedly, the company had made payments to foreign officials in order to secure defence contracts from Hungary, Saudi Arabia and numerous other countries in the 1980’s and 1990’s.

 

Three years after U.S. investigations, the company admitted to issuing false statements of FCPA compliance. The company was fined a sum nearly amounting to $500 million.

 

The abovementioned cases are only small representations of how rampant bribery has become especially in the corporate world. The FCPA enforces civil penalties including fines depending on the flagrancy of the violation and forbiddance of continuing and/or conducting business with the government to those found to be guilty of bribery. One can only hope that these penalties and sanctions are enough to discourage companies from ever engaging in the illegal act.